Showing posts with label Religion and Science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Religion and Science. Show all posts

Thursday, May 30, 2013

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences

This is very interesting and I'm sure that the thought has not occurred to many....

Raziya
Follow us in Twitter | The Muslim Times | Alislam |  Subscribe

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences
Epigraph:

Blessed is He (Allah) in Whose hand is the kingdom, and He has power over all things; … Who has created seven heavens in harmony. No incongruity canst thou see in the creation of the Gracious God. Then look again: Seest thou any flaw? Aye, look again, and yet again, thy sight will only return unto thee confused and fatigued.  (Al Quran 67:2-5)

Introduction

This is a must read for every high school mathematics and physics student and every seeker, who desires to conceptualize the relationship between religion and science and desires to appreciate the meaning of one of the celebrated quotes of Albert Einstein, "That deeply emotional conviction of the presence of superior reasoning power, which is revealed in the incomprehensible universe, forms my idea of God."
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences is the title of an article published in 1960 by the physicist Eugene Wigner.[1] In the paper, Wigner observed that the mathematical structure of a physical theory often points the way to further advances in that theory and even to empirical predictions.
Wigner begins his paper with the belief, common to all those familiar with mathematics, that mathematical concepts have applicability far beyond the context in which they were originally developed. Based on his experience, he says "it is important to point out that the mathematical formulation of the physicist's often crude experience leads in an uncanny number of cases to an amazingly accurate description of a large class of phenomena." He then invokes the fundamental law of gravitation as an example. Originally used to model freely falling bodies on the surface of the earth, this law was extended on the basis of what Wigner terms "very scanty observations" to describe the motion of the planets, where it "has proved accurate beyond all reasonable expectations."
Another oft-cited example is Maxwell's equations, derived to model the elementary electrical and magnetic phenomena known as of the mid 19th century. These equations also describe radio waves, discovered by Heinrich Hertz in 1887 a few years after Maxwell's death. Wigner sums up his argument by saying that "the enormous usefulness of mathematics in the natural sciences is something bordering on the mysterious and that there is no rational explanation for it." He concludes his paper with the same question with which he began:
The miracle of the appropriateness of the language of mathematics for the formulation of the laws of physics is a wonderful gift which we neither understand nor deserve. We should be grateful for it and hope that it will remain valid in future research and that it will extend, for better or for worse, to our pleasure, even though perhaps also to our bafflement, to wide branches of learning.
Wigner's work provided a fresh insight into both physics and the philosophy of mathematics, and has been fairly often cited in the academic literature on thephilosophy of physics and of mathematics. Wigner speculated on the relationship between the philosophy of science and the foundations of mathematics as follows:
It is difficult to avoid the impression that a miracle confronts us here, quite comparable in its striking nature to the miracle that the human mind can string a thousand arguments together without getting itself into contradictions, or to the two miracles of laws of nature and of the human mind's capacity to divine them.

Beginning of the article

Here is how the article starts:
Mathematics, rightly viewed, possesses not only truth, but supreme beauty, a beauty cold and austere, like that of sculpture, without appeal to any part of our weaker nature, without the gorgeous trappings of painting or music, yet sublimely pure, and capable of a stern perfection such as only the greatest art can show. The true spirit of delight, the exaltation, the sense of being more than Man, which is the touchstone of the highest excellence, is to be found in mathematics as surely as in poetry. –BERTRAND RUSSELL, Study of Mathematics
THERE IS A story about two friends, who were classmates in high school, talking about their jobs. One of them became a statistician and was working on population trends. He showed a reprint to his former classmate. The reprint started, as usual, with the Gaussian distribution and the statistician explained to his former classmate the meaning of the symbols for the actual population, for the average population, and so on. His classmate was a bit incredulous and was not quite sure whether the statistician was pulling his leg. "How can you know that?" was his query. "And what is this symbol here?" "Oh," said the statistician, "this is pi." "What is that?" "The ratio of the circumference of the circle to its diameter." "Well, now you are pushing your joke too far," said the classmate, "surely the population has nothing to do with the circumference of the circle."
Naturally, we are inclined to smile about the simplicity of the classmate's approach. Nevertheless, when I heard this story, I had to admit to an eerie feeling because, surely, the reaction of the classmate betrayed only plain common sense. I was even more confused when, not many days later, someone came to me and expressed his bewilderment [1 The remark to be quoted was made by F. Werner when he was a student in Princeton.] with the fact that we make a rather narrow selection when choosing the data on which we test our theories. "How do we know that, if we made a theory which focuses its attention on phenomena we disregard and disregards some of the phenomena now commanding our attention, that we could not build another theory which has little in common with the present one but which, nevertheless, explains just as many phenomena as the present theory?" It has to be admitted that we have no definite evidence that there is no such theory.
The preceding two stories illustrate the two main points which are the subjects of the present discourse. The first point is that mathematical concepts turn up in entirely unexpected connections. Moreover, they often permit an unexpectedly close and accurate description of the phenomena in these connections. Secondly, just because of this circumstance, and because we do not understand the reasons of their usefulness, we cannot know whether a theory formulated in terms of mathematical concepts is uniquely appropriate. We are in a position similar to that of a man who was provided with a bunch of keys and who, having to open several doors in succession, always hit on the right key on the first or second trial. He became skeptical concerning the uniqueness of the coordination between keys and doors.
Most of what will be said on these questions will not be new; it has probably occurred to most scientists in one form or another. My principal aim is to illuminate it from several sides. The first point is that the enormous usefulness of mathematics in the natural sciences is something bordering on the mysterious and that there is no rational explanation for it. Second, it is just this uncanny usefulness of mathematical concepts that raises the question of the uniqueness of our physical theories. In order to establish the first point, that mathematics plays an unreasonably important role in physics, it will be useful to say a few words on the question, "What is mathematics?", then, "What is physics?", then, how mathematics enters physical theories, and last, why the success of mathematics in its role in physics appears so baffling. Much less will be said on the second point: the uniqueness of the theories of physics. A proper answer to this question would require elaborate experimental and theoretical work which has not been undertaken to date.
Read in the Muslim Times.


The Muslim Times' Editorial team: If you like what you see, please forward it to friends and family.  To know more about us: click here.
1-800-WHY-ISLAM

Sunday, March 10, 2013

Tracing the Triumphant Discovery of Higgs Boson

The Muslim Times | Contact us | Alislam |  Subscribe 

Tracing the Triumphant Discovery of Higgs Boson
Epigraph:
"The ink of the scholar is holier than the blood of the martyr."  The Holy Prophet Muhammad




 
 
The Ahmadiyya Muslim Community in Germany is organizing an event on the newly discovered Higgs-Boson.
The function is on March 1st 2013, in the Bashier-Mosque in Bensheim. The founder of the Higgs-theory, Prof. Tom Kibble from Imperial College in London, will deliver a lecture on this theory and about Nobel Laureate, Dr. Abdus Salam's contribution to this milestone.
Second lecturer is by Dr. Mansoora Shamim, an Ahmadi Muslim and a scientist from CERN. She will also give a lecture on Dr. Salam's life and some technical aspects of the discovery.
 
The Muslim Times' Editorial team: If you like what you see, please forward it to friends and family.  To know more about us: click here.
1-800-WHY-ISLAM

-- 
'One learned man is harder on the devil than a thousand ignorant worshipers': Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)

Friday, February 15, 2013

Science without Religion Is Lame, Religion without Science Is Blind!

The Muslim Times | Contact us | Alislam |  Subscribe 
Science without Religion Is Lame, Religion without Science Is Blind!
Epigraph:
"In the creation of the heavens and the earth and in the alternation of the night and the day there are indeed Signs for men of understanding; those who remember Allah while standing, sitting, and lying on their sides, and ponder over the creation of the heavens and the earth: 'Our Lord, Thou hast not created this in vain; nay, Holy art Thou; save us, then, from the punishment of the Fire.'" (Al Quran 3:191-192)


 
Written and Collected by Zia H Shah MD
Charles Robert Darwin, FRS (12 February 1809 – 19 April 1882) was an English naturalist.

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Albert Einstein’s search for God

Interesting & enlightening...

Raziya


The Muslim Times | Contact us | Alislam |  Subscribe
Albert Einstein's search for God
Epigraph:
"Eyes cannot reach Him but He reaches the eyes. And He is the Incomprehensible, the All-Aware." (Al Quran 6:104)
"That humble attitude of mind toward the grandeur of reason incarnate in existence, which in its profoundest depths, is inaccessible to man." Albert Einstein


 
By Zia H Shah MD
Prologue
This popular article was first published in Ahmadiyya Gazette, USA in 2007.
Was Einstein a monotheist, deist, pantheist, or an atheist? How did his religion affect his science?
Agnostics, atheists and pantheists, all equally claim that Einstein belongs to them. But, as he belonged to Jewish background, Abrahamic traditions or Monotheism, should certainly have a claim on him. Here is an attempt to understand the religion of Einstein in an Islamic paradigm. It is a religious and scientific biography of a man named 'the man of the century' by the Time magazine. This article was originally published in October, 2007 volume of Ahmadiyya Gazette USA.
If my articles are boring to you, it may be that you need to read more of them, as was suggested by John Cage, "If something is boring after two minutes, try it for four. If still boring, then eight. Then sixteen. Then thirty-two. Eventually one discovers that it is not boring at all."
INTRODUCTION
Allah – there is no god save Him, the Living, the Self-Subsisting and All-Sustaining. Slumber seizes Him not, nor sleep. To Him belongs whatsoever is in the heavens and whatsoever is in the earth. Who is he that dare intercede with Him save by His permission? He knows what is before them and what is behind them; and they encompass nothing of His knowledge except what He pleases. His knowledge extends over the heavens and the earth; and the care of them wearies Him not; and He is the High, the Great. (Al Quran 2:256)
Whatever is in the heavens and whatever is in the earth glorifies Allah; and He is the Mighty, the Wise. (Al Quran 61:2)
A belief bound up with deep feeling in a superior mind that reveals itself in the world of experience, represents my conception of God.[2]  Albert Einstein
The Messiah, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani, the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community has said, "The God of Islam is the same God who is visible in the mirror of the laws of nature and is discernible in the book of nature. Islam has not presented a new God but has presented the same God who is presented by the light of man's heart, by the conscience of man, and by the universe."[3]
To know the God, "who is visible in the mirror of the laws of nature," we need to know those laws. It is not possible to fully appreciate God's creation and sustenance of the universe in physical terms without understanding the basics of physics.  The good news is that these concepts are not hard to grasp if we do not dwell on the mathematical precepts supporting the theories of physics.
It is hoped that this article should be easily readable, not requiring any background in physics or mathematics.  In the words of Einstein, "Most of the fundamental ideas of science are essentially simple, and may, as a rule, be expressed in a language comprehensible to everyone."[4]
In 1999 Einstein was named Time magazine's "Person of the Century," and a poll of prominent physicists named him the greatest physicist of all time. In popular culture the name "Einstein" has become synonymous with genius.
In recent years some four hundred books about his life and work have appeared.  Scores of biographies have been written over the years.  A recent biography by Max Jammer covers his religiosity and his philosophy of religion.  The title of the book is Einstein and Religion.  A Swiss novelist and playwright Friedrich Durrenmatt once said, "Einstein used to speak so often of God that I tend to believe he has been a disguised theologian."[5]
It is important to understand the religion of Einstein in the Muslim paradigm so that we can achieve a better "Islam and science" correlation and can communicate better with those who are overawed or enamored with science.

EINSTEIN'S CHILDHOOD AMBITION

Science is the systematic study of nature and different scientists occupy themselves with different questions which may be focused on one element in chemistry or one plant or animal in biology or some other aspect of nature.  Einstein did not want to limit the scope of his study.  He wanted to focus on the biggest question of all—from where this universe came.  By age 12, Einstein had decided to devote himself to solving the big riddle of the universe. He wanted to occupy himself with the question that if he were God, how he would create the universe.  In a later conversation with Esther Salaman, a student of Physics, he said, "I want to know how God created this world.  I'm not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element.  I want to know His thoughts, the rest are details."[6]  In this article, we embark on a joyful journey of his childhood dream in search of God.

HIS EARLY LIFE

Albert Einstein was born in 1879 at Ulm. When be was four years old his father, who owned an electrochemical works, moved to Munich, and two years later the boy went to school, experiencing a rigid, almost military, type of discipline and also the isolation of a shy and contemplative Jewish child among Roman Catholics—factors which made a deep and enduring impression. From the point of view of his teachers he was an unsatisfactory pupil, apparently incapable of grasping languages, history, geography, and other primary subjects. His interest in mathematics was roused, not by his instructors, but by a Jewish medical student, Max Talmey, who gave him a book on geometry, and so set him upon a course of enthusiastic study which made him, at the age of fourteen, a better mathematician than his instructors. Einstein called it the "holy little geometry book."  At this stage, he began the study of philosophy, reading and re-reading the words of Kant, Hume, Spinoza and other metaphysicians.
In 1894, when Einstein was fifteen, his father's business failed and the Einstein family moved to Italy, first to Milan and then, after a few months, to Pavia. Albert had been left behind in Munich to finish high school, but in the spring of 1895, he withdrew to join his family in Pavia, convincing the school to let him go by using a doctor's note.  Rather than completing high school, Albert decided to apply directly to the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, Switzerland. Without a school certificate, he was required to take an entrance examination. He did not pass. Einstein wrote that it was in that same year, at age 16, that he first performed his famous thought experiment, visualizing traveling alongside a beam of light.
Finally, backed by a certificate of mathematical proficiency given by a teacher in Munich, he was able to obtain admission to the Polytechnic Academy at Zurich. Once admitted, the young Einstein became absorbed in the pursuit of science and philosophy and made astonishing progress. After five distinguished years at the Polytechnic he hoped to step into the post of assistant professor, but found that the kindly words of the professors who had stimulated the hope did not materialize.
After his graduation in the spring of 1900, he became a Swiss citizen, and worked for two months as a mathematics teacher.  He could not find a job in any of the universities, so settled for an employment as an examiner at the Swiss patent office in Bern. With his newfound security, he started working on his scientific pursuits.
Early in 1905, Einstein published in the prestigious physics monthly a thesis, "A New Determination of Molecular Dimensions," that won him a Ph.D. from the University of Zürich. In the same year, his monograph on the special theory of relativity was published in a Swiss scientific journal, the Annalen der Physik. Zurich awoke to the fact that it possessed a genius in the form of a patent office clerk, and promoted him to be a lecturer at the University.  Many useful contributions to Physics were published in the same calendar year of 1905.  That turned out to be a miracle year in his life.  Four years later in I909, the University installed him as Professor.

EINSTEIN'S THEORIES

Imagination is more important than knowledge. Einstein
The distinction between past, present and future is only an illusion, however persistent.  Einstein
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. Einstein
The gift of fantasy has meant more to me than my talent or absorbing positive knowledge. Einstein
Before we can know his religion we need to know a little about the scientist, Albert Einstein.  He developed the special theory of relativity in 1905 and his general theory of relativity in 1916.  He won the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1921 for his explanation of the photoelectric effect that was separate and not related to the theory of relativity. In the first 15 years of the 20th century, Einstein was recognized in his own time as one of the most creative intellects in human history.  His theories proposed entirely new ways of thinking about space, time, and gravitation. These theories were a profound advance over the old Newtonian physics and revolutionized scientific and philosophical inquiry.
Einstein postulated that light is composed of individual quanta (later called photons) that, in addition to wavelike behavior, demonstrate certain properties unique to particles. This understanding of the dual nature of light was needed to explain some of the phenomena that had been observed in study of light.  For example it was known that when some solids were struck by light, they emitted electrons.  This phenomenon is called the photoelectric effect.   The wave theory of light did not explain this phenomenon, but conceptualizing the light to be also particle beautifully solved this riddle.
The special theory of relativity was proposed in 1905 by Albert Einstein in his article "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies." Einstein's work confirmed the earlier conclusions of Hendrik Lorentz and Henri Poincaré. Some three centuries earlier, Galileo's principle of relativity had stated that all uniform motion was relative, and that there was no absolute and well-defined state of rest; a person on the deck of a ship may be at rest in his opinion, but someone observing from the shore would say that he was moving. Einstein's theory combines Galilean relativity with the postulate that all observers will always measure the speed of light to be the same no matter what their state of uniform linear motion is.
Before Einstein it was thought that time is a constant no matter where you were and no matter what speed you were traveling.  Einstein proposed that it was the speed of light that was a constant and that time variable and depended on the speed of the observer and the observed.  In a nutshell, this was his special theory of relativity.
Till the time of Einstein mass was considered to be physical and tangible and energy nebulous, but he discovered the famous equation E= mc2.  This relationship or equation is now re­garded as the foundation of theoretical physics and modern tech­nology, and thanks to the present media, this equation has risen to the level of common knowledge.  Here 'E' is the energy, 'm' is the mass and 'c' is the speed of light.   As an inference from this equation, even a small amount of mass has a very large energy, given the extremely high speed of light.  Every gram of matter (of any kind) has stored within it the equivalent of 25,000,000 kilowatt hours of energy.
His theory of General relativity was an explanation of what is the cause of gravity.  From Sir Isaac Newton, we know that gravity keeps the planets in motion and keeps our feet on the surface of earth, but no one knew the underlying cause or source of this.  Einstein's theory of general relativity unifies special relativity, Newton's law of universal gravitation, and the insight that gravitational acceleration can be described by the curvature of space and time.   Einstein, in simple, mathematical models, showed that large planets like the sun cause a distortion in time and space around it and that this creates a gravitational pull.  In 1919, Sir Arthur Eddington announced that observations of stars near the eclipsed Sun confirming general relativity's prediction that massive objects bend light. Since then, many other observations and experiments have confirmed many of the predictions of general relativity.  Last but not the least, a better understanding of gravity has helped enable mankind to travel into space.
Read further in the Muslim Times
The Muslim Times' Editorial team: If you like what you see, please forward it to friends and family.  To know more about us: click here.
1-800-WHY-ISLAM

-- 
'One learned man is harder on the devil than a thousand ignorant worshipers': Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)

Monday, February 4, 2013

Challenging Tahir-ul-Qadri and all Medievalist Muslim Preachers to Debate regarding the Facts of Evolution

The Muslim Times | Alislam |  Subscribe 
Challenging Tahir-ul-Qadri and all Medievalist Muslim Preachers to Debate regarding the Facts of Evolution
Epigraph:
"O ye people! fear your Lord, Who created you from a single being and created from her (mother unicellular organism) her mate , and from them twain spread many men and women; and fear Allah, in Whose name you appeal to one another, and fear Him particularly respecting ties of relationship. Indeed, Allah watches over you." (Al Quran 4:2)

Western Lowland Gorilla portrait: Reflecting not only the facts of evolution but also the ferocity of my arguments that the preachers are up against
By Zia H Shah MD
I issue a challenge to all the popular preachers of Islam, who do not believe that humans are genetically related to apes and descended from them, in a manner of speaking, for a written debate.
I am not arguing the details of the history or how all the life forms came about, whether there was subtle guidance by a Creator or not, I am only stating the fact that we are related to chimpanzees and gorillas.
At some point in our earth history we share parents with not only chimpanzees and gorillas but also with monkeys.  Be my guest! Come and debate with me rather than confusing the masses and winning cheap popularity.
The popular preachers like Tahir ul Qadri, Zakir Naik, Yusuf Estes and Harun Yahya try to make fun of Sir Charles Darwin, a great visionary in my opinion.  I do not have to agree with every thing that he said to think that he was a great scientist and a figure of enormous stature, much taller than those who choose to ridicule him.
All these preachers, presented here have a few things in common.  They are all fairly popular among their circles.  They dogmatically deny the evidence of links between different animals, including the human beings, without any in depth study, banking on the ignorance of their followers.
I will show the position of these preachers in a few short video clips and a quote and then proceed with showing my hand.
Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri (born 19 February 1951) is a Pakistani politician, former law professor and a Sufi scholar. He was a former professor of international constitutional law at the University of the Punjab. Qadri is also the founder and Chairman of Minhaj-ul-Quran International. In March 2012 he was described by CNN-IBN as an 'International Peace Ambassador.'
...
Adnan Oktar (born 1956), also known as Harun Yahya, is a Turkish author referred to as "the biggest propagator of ijaz literature" as well as an Islamic creationist. In 2007, he sent thousands of unsolicited copies of his book, Atlas of Creation, which advocates Islamic creationism, to American scientists, members of Congress, and science museums. Oktar runs two organizations of which he is also the Honorary President: Bilim Arastirma Vakfi ("Science Research Foundation", BAV, established 1990), which promotes creationism and Milli Degerleri Koruma Vakfi ("Foundation to Protect National Values", established 1995) which claimed to promote Turkish nationalism. In the last two decades, Oktar has been involved in a number of legal cases, both as defendant and plaintiff.
Harun Yahya in his otherwise useful book titled, the Creation of the Universe, commits the error of denying evolution of apes into humans, which in light of latest findings in molecular biology and genetics is being increasingly recognized as a fact in scientific circles.
Harun Yahya writes:
The subject most often brought up by advocates of the theory of evolution is the subject of the origin of man.  The Darwinist claim holds that man evolved from so called ape-like creatures.  During this alleged  volutionary process, which is supposed to have started 4-5 million years ago, some "transitional forms" between man and his imaginary ancestors are supposed to have existed. According to this completely imaginary scenario, four basic "categories" are listed:
 1. Australopithecus
 2. Homo habilis
 3. Homo erectus
 4. Homo sapiens
Evolutionists call man's so-called first ape-like ancestors Australopithecus, which means "South African ape."  These living beings are actually nothing but an old ape species that has become extinct. Extensive research done on various Australopithecus specimens by two world famous anatomists from England and the USA, namely, Lord Solly Zuckerman and Prof. Charles Oxnard, shows that these apes belonged to an ordinary ape species that became extinct and bore no resemblance to humans.
Yahya's book is available online free, on his websites.
Yahya's dogmatic denial of relationship between apes and human beings exposes only his ignorance, specifically in the domain of genetics and molecular biology.
All the proofs that creationists offer for the improbabilities that have gone into making our universe biophyllic or in the creation of individual life forms or organs can serve only as argument for guided evolution, once the similarities are shown in genetic materials of closely related animals including apes and human beings.
These similarities not only exist in the genome but extend to proteins and all other constituents of life that have been examined so far.  Chimpanzee genome is 98-99% similar to human genome and for even greater resemblance among the two, see my article, Molecular Biology: A Checkmate to Creationism.
When any of these preachers speak or write, they create an aura as if they know what they are talking about.  Do they?
Would any of the above four or their cronies dare to engage in a written debate with me on this issue.  We can negotiate the details of the debate.  Writings of both parties will be precisely reproduced here in the Muslim Times and in their websites of their choosing.
Watch the video clips and read further in the Muslim Times.
The Muslim Times' Editorial team: If you like what you see, please forward it to friends and family.  To know more about us: click here.
1-800-WHY-ISLAM

-- 
'One learned man is harder on the devil than a thousand ignorant worshipers': Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)